![]() There he witnessed resistance fighters in action. He was dismissed after sustaining injuries to his face from exploding shrapnel but returned to the front lines soon after. Otherwise, I think it's very fun even in spite of the terrible Zombies mode.Carver Butcher (instant unlock with the Season Four Battle Pass)īutcher served in the British Army during Operation Devon, battling against the 16th Panzer Division. Overall, if you don't like Modern Warfare 2019, I probably wouldn't recommend this game for you. Cold War was not scrutinized this badly for historical inaccuracy so it doesn't really make any sense for people to do the same to Vanguard. I don't really see the "wokeness" in the campaign unless you're complaining about a black guy being the lead character for some reason. On another note, this game seems to have an issue with attracting strange complaints, including accusations of being woke and historical inaccuracies. If Activision is reading this, stop forcing Treyarch on projects and giving them unreasonable deadlines. Overall, just buy Cold War if you really want a Zombies game. ![]() If there's anything remotely good I can say about it, you actually have to spend in-game currency to upgrade perks and field upgrades now instead of having them maxed out at the start, which prevents having an overabundance of it like with Cold War. It's INCREDIBLY boring, repetitive, doesn't even have an easter egg, and should have been post launch content at BEST. As of writing this, there's currently only one map called "Der Anfang" and it's Treyarch's attempt to merge classic round based Zombies and the new modes (Outbreak and Onslaught) introduced in Cold War. The Zombies mode is the result of Activision putting Treyarch through the wringer since 2018. The amount of content is great too 36-38 weapons and 20 maps AT LAUNCH that singlehandedly outclass both Modern Warfare and Cold War in both quantity and quality, minus a few bad apples. Not to say that there aren't any issues, things like the utterly broken shotguns and numerous bugs have been very frustrating to deal with since launch, but I've been enjoying the multiplayer a LOT more than Cold War. The camping problem has largely been solved with the introduction of destructible environments and movement feels a lot smoother. It's mostly the same with mechanics like tactical sprinting and mounting returning, but there are tons of other things that have been significantly improved on. Unless you really hate the World War 2 setting a lot. If you liked Multiplayer in Modern Warfare, Vanguard's isn't really that different. It's a bit weird, but there's a lot of stories that have already been told with World War 2, so I didn't really mind it, especially since the cast nailed their roles. ![]() With the way the levels/storytelling is ordered, the campaign was more centered around the main characters rather than the actual plot itself. ![]() Even before this game's release, people were ragging all over it, saying things like "Battlefield will kill Call of Duty" or "we don't want another World War 2 shooter." And now that the game's been out for a while, I genuinely think 90% of the hate for Vanguard is completely unreasonable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |